Brit-Am Anthropology and DNA Update (11 January 2016, 1 Shevet, 5776)
Contents:
1. Stephen Phillips: The Theory of Evolution is False
2. Ireland saw prehistoric migration from Middle East
3. Mutations and DNA
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1. Stephen Phillips: The Theory of Evolution is False
Shalom Yair
Â
Amnon Goldberg might be interested in the following:-
Â
The Most Informative Neanderthal Show Ever pt 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuY-q401PT0
The Most Informative Neaderthal Show Ever pt 2: https://soundcloud.com/real-science-radio/the-most-informative-neanderth
Â
Jack Cuozzo, who is the guest in the above radio talks, is an orthodontist and palaeontologist and is one of the few people who have been able to examine the original neanderthal skulls. What he has uncovered is a pack of lies and deceptions perpertrated by people who have the gall to call themselves scientists! I am currently half way through his book Buried Alive. It is very revealing. (He has also found a rock painting of a dinosaur fighting a mammoth in a cave in Bernifal, France, which paeolontologists are trying to keep under wraps.)
Â
The following website is also very interesting: https://truthopia.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/i-science-k-origin-of-man-evolution-style-neanderthal-man/
Â
As for dinosaurs co-existing with man, there are plenty of examples written and depicted in stone which man does not want us to know about, so these so-called scientists do everything in their power to discredit them. Strabo, Herodotus, Diodorus, Pausanias and Pliny all describe flying lizards which existed in their day as well as a Stegasaurus Armatus, sauropods (juvenile sauropods are actually depicted on the Narmer Palette as well as on the Uruk Cylinder Seal, but archaeologists are insisting that they are fanciful depictions of lionesses!), and a number of other dinosaurs. Academics are arguing that these writers are describing large snakes, but as Pausanias records, "the big dragons which grow to more than 30 cubits (45 feet), such as are found in India and in Libya, are said by the Epiduarians not to be snakes but some other kind of creature". (2.28.1) Strabo even tells us that they had grass growing on their backs! (16.4.16) Marco Polo's 'ridiculous description of a crocodile', with two short front legs with three claws like those of a tiger and eyes the size of a 3lb loaf of bread can likewise only be understood correctly if you accept that he is describing an Allosaurus. But that would be unacceptable in the eyes of academics who will not let go of their evolutionary theories! Basically, evolution is a false religion.
Â
Have a look at the Palestrina Mosaic. (See for example https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/04/Nile_Mosaic.jpg) In it are depicted a number of animals which have been classed as prehistoric and should not still have been alive in the first century BCE. Believe it or not, it is argued that the huge dinosaur-like creature in the lake is an otter! If we compare this picture with that of an otter, there is no comparison. First of all, if we ignore the size of the beast in relation to the hunters, the creature's two front legs are far too long for those of an otter. Secondly, the Greek name for an otter is enidris, yet the creature in the mosaic is clearly labelled in bold Greek letters Krokodilopardolis, which, translated, means 'Panther Crocodile'. This then is a reptilian creature.
Â
Also included in the mosaic is a pliohippus, an iguanadon, a camelops, a creature labelled Krokodiloxerxaios ([Dry] Land Crocodile) a creature which, according to Herodotus and Pausanias, could only be found in Libya, and an entelodont (dinohyus, or terrible pig). It is labelled Xsipig, which I can only interpret as meaning 'Razor [tooth] pig'. The word pig, which is not a Greek or a Latin name, appears to be derived from the Egyptian word for pig, a word which is understood to have been pronounced Apekh or similar.
Â
This same creature (the entelodont), which supposedly became extinct around 5 million years ago, can also be seen in the mosaic at The House of the Physician in Pompeii. (See http://www.theoi.com/image/F48.1Pygmaioi.jpg.)
Â
I have prepared a video on these findings and will shortly upload to Youtube. I just have the soundtrack to prepare.
Â
Regards,
Steve
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2. Ireland saw prehistoric migration from Middle East
http://www.dw.com/en/ireland-saw-prehistoric-migration-from-middle-east/a-18946483
Genome analysis of four ancient humans has shown there was mass migration into Ireland from the Middle East. The findings could explain the origins of Irish culture and language.
A team of geneticists and archaeologists have found that Ireland experienced a massive prehistoric wave of migration from the Middle East and Eastern Europe, after sequencing genomes from ancient Irish humans. The findings were published in a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS).
Dan Bradley, lead researcher and a genetics professor from Trinity College Dublin, said the results suggested that the woman farmer "has about 60 percent Middle Eastern origins." Modern farming is thought to have begun in the Middle East over 10,000 years ago.
"This is a rough estimate but we are certainly comfortable stating that she has majority Middle Eastern ancestry," said Bradley.
The three Bronze Age men, who were found on Rathlin Island off Northern Ireland, have nearly a 30 percent genetic makeup "from the peoples originating above the Black Sea," Bradley said.
Cultural significance
According to the researchers, the woman farmer had black hair, brown eyes and resembled southern Europeans.
The three men were found to have excessive iron retention, which is often found in people of Irish descent and commonly referred to as a Celtic disease.
"Genetic affinity is strongest between Bronze Age genomes and modern Irish, Scottish and Welsh, suggesting establishment of central attributes of the insular Celtic genome 4,000 years ago," said Lara Cassidy, professor at Trinity College and another author of the report.
According to Bradley, the findings point to a strong possibility that the ancestral Celtic languages of Ireland, Scotland and Wales were introduced by the massive prehistoric migration wave.
"Our discovery of a major migration to Ireland in the Bronze Age does at least identify this horizon as a candidate," he said.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3. Mutations and DNA
http://creation.com/mutations-new-information
Can mutation create new information? Yes, depending on what you mean by 'information'. Also, 'new' does not necessarily imply 'better' or even 'good'. When evolutionists cite examples of 'new' information, they are almost invariably citing evidence of new traits, but these traits are caused by the corruption of existing information. Mutations can create new varieties of old genes, as can be seen in white-coated lab mice, tailless cats, and blue-eyed people. But damaging mutations cannot be used to vindicate molecules-to-people evolution. Breaking things does not lead to higher function (and presupposes a pre-existing function that can be broken). Also, not all new traits are caused by mutation! Some come about by unscrambling pre-existing information, some from decompressing packed information, some from turning on and off certain genes.
In all the examples I have seen used to argue against creation, evolution is not helped. There are no known examples of the types of information-gaining mutations necessary for large-scale evolutionary processes. In fact, it looks like all examples of gain-of-function mutations, put in light of the long-term needs of upward evolutionary progress, are exceptions to what is needed, because every example I have seen involves something breaking.