|
A few words of introduction:
A corrupt Arab leadership has twisted the Koran for their own purposes and profit.
Their method has been using an abuse of Islam to demonize Israel. There are hundreds of millions of Muslims that do not believe that Isreal should surrender anything to various Arab/Muslim entities. In fact, the worse nightmare of many Israeli Arab citizens would be to fall under Arab gangster-style organizations (Fatah, PLO, PA) or theocratic tyrannical groups (Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Aksa Brigade, etc).
Turkey is a Sunni Muslim country which formerly had great relations with Israel, to the extent of having joint military operations. Israel hasn't changed. Turkey has fallen under fanatic extremism. Iran, under Shah Pahlavi, a religious Shi'ite Muslim, was a good friend to the West and to Israel. Once again, Israel has not changed anything about itself. Iran was hijacked by fanatical ayatollahs who hate the West and Israel. For example, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, said publicly "that on the day one atom bomb goes off in Israel, 10 atom bombs will go off in 10 American cities." The bottom line is: Shah Pahlavi felt that Islam could be interpreted in a tolerant, peaceful and friendly way. He went into exile over his view, avoiding assassination and later dying of cancer, fleeing from country to country.
There have been several studies done to evaluate what are the absolute minimal borders needed for the survival of the State of Israel.
There were several done by the Pentagon. One that comes to mind is the one led by General Wheeler, a world class military expert. The short of it is that Israel must have the territory of Judea and Samaria. The Jordan River Valley, Negev, Sinai, and the Golan Heights. To chop off these historic areas is to endanger the very survival of the only ethical democracy in the Middle East. The forces that be who seek to tear Israel apart in stages. These political attacks are ipso facto helping those who seek to. commit genocide against Israel.
Furthermore, a fair judicial overview of these terror organizations would prove their goal of genocide. They would be convicted of the same 15 war crime charges as Nazi leader Adolf Eichman.
While Western media under-reports Muslim atrocities against Muslims, they inflate any perceived misconduct of Jews or Christians against Muslims as an atrocity (John Loftus and Mark Aarons, - "The Secret War Against the Jews - How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People)."
Did you know that less than a year ago, Pakistan drove out of its own territory, around 1.8 million fellow Muslims who were against their government. They ousted them forcibly with machine guns and bayonets, out into the deadly winter. No medical help, tents, food or blankets were provided for the refugees. The whole episode received almost zero media coverage. Why should the media cover a story that would make Israel look like a nation and army of saints?
Even after Hamas admitted that they faked the number of casualties, the western media kept disseminating these fictitious numbers. Yet, Israel has produced the lowest civilian casualty percentage of any military confrontations in history. Here is one example: The total for Korean War military dead was 795,000, but the civilian-to-combatant death ratio was about 75%. 20% of the population in North Korea perished in the war (1953).
Even if you use false, exaggerated numbers given by Hamas, their civilian casualties comprise less than 1% of the population of Gaza. The truth is still the truth, no matter how many lies they propagate. Israel has the most righteous and moral, military force in history.
The purity of arms of the IDF is unparalleled.
Professor Daniel Pipes has written 16 books on Islam and is a world expert on the Middle East. He proves that the Palestinians have developed a unique, genocidal rejectionism. Not only is it weird but it is counterproductive. The Arabs rejoice in the death toll of their own people. They believe that to die fighting the infidels (Jews, Christians and the rest of the non-Muslim world) is the highest of the highest way to go to heaven. Their high numbers of death tolls will increase worldwide hatred of Israel. Even Hezbollah and the Palestinian Authority don't purposely seek to starve their own people, but Hamas does. The PA (Palestinian Authority) hates Israel as much as Hamas does. It just uses craftier and more diplomatic means.
There have been several studies done to evaluate what are the absolute, minimal borders needed for the survival of the State of Israel. The UN, EU and the White House are trying to push Israel back into indefensible borders.
Remember that the PA teaches that there was no Holocaust. Yet their present-day plans for Israel, in reality, involve a holocaust to unfold in stages. Think back centuries to when the Soviet Union came into being. It took a while to realize what a perverse system of government it was - far worse than anything that had existed before.
Haj Amin al-Husseini helped convince Hitler to implement the Final Solution, rather than to simply expel the Jews. The Germans thought that Husseini would become the next caliphate, the equivalent of what the pope was to the Catholics before the Vatican II Conference.
Husseini promised Hitler that he would rally the whole Arab, Muslim world to side with the nazis. He remained a dominant figure in what was to become the PA, until his death in 1974.
The PA and all their terrorist organizations are confident that the UN will help them in their ultimate goals of weakening Israel to a point that it can be destroyed. And that fact is being played out every day. Hamas rips UN for teaching the holocaust, and so do another 15 Arab, Muslim terror groups. J. Telegraphic Agency, August 31, 2009.
Also, Iran's claim of innocuous nuclear ambitions is a result of the Islamic doctrine of "takiya" (the need to lie to infidels). Experts insist that the Iranians have the capacity to produce three atomic bombs right now.
There is an exhibition in the UN complex that exposes the damage that terrorism has perpetrated throughout the world. However, not a single example of Arab/Palestinian terrorism committed against Israel is shown. The UN does not acknowledge the horrors of October 7 th. Nor do they acknowledge the thousands of terrorist incidents enacted against the State of Israel. The UN has obviously accepted a genocidal position against the people of Israel, following the pogroms and terrorist acts waged before the State of Israel was declared in 1948.
Some journalists say that if Israel ever uses nuclear weapons against Iran, the Balfour Declaration becomes null and void.
Backdrop: The Balfour Declaration essentially recognized the declaration of friendship between Dr. Chaim Weitzman and King Abdullah. Weitzman represented the Jewish people and the King represented Arab Muslims. They signed a treaty recognizing each other. Subsequent international forums like the San Remo Conference recognized the treaty Dr. Weitzman and King Abdullah as lawful. The League of Nations, likewise, acknowledged the validity of the friendship treat between the Jews and Arabs.
The League of Nations originally granted the entire British Mandate Palestine to be used for a Jewish State.
The French and the British created 23 Arab states out of the former Turk Ottoman Empire.
Eventually the Jews were awarded 1% of that empire. Yet, 80% of that promised 1% for the Jews, was given to Arab Muslims, which was at that time called the Jordanian Hashemite Kingdom of Palestine.
There was never an item in any of the agreements above that limited any of the above nations from defending themselves however they deemed necessary. The creation of the 23Arab states never included a legal clause that forbid use of nuclear weapons. Yet, Israel is held to a completely different standard by rabidly antisemitic journalists who race to demonize Israel's right to be nuclear ready. Unfortunately, the public too often believes whatever they see in print or view online, no matter how slanted it is.
Former President Donald Trump, on a nationally-televised speech, talked about Israel's right to use nuclear weapons. He pointed out that although the US beat the Japanese in the Pacific, the Japs refused to surrender. Addressing this issue: the USA's use of WWII atomic bombs was not to save the USA and free world but to force the Japanese to unconditional surrender. The US did not want to have to crush the remaining Japanese resistance by soldiers putting their lives on the line. Instead, the atomic bomb crushed them.
Trump pointed out, that in Israel's case, the use of nuclear weapons against Iran is far more' justifiable than was the US's use of them over the Japanese. He understood that if Israel was to use a nuclear weapon against Iran, it would be to save itself from annihilation. He continued (while President) to say that he and the White House would support Israel's use of a nuclear weapon for its very survival.
Back to history: Former Israeli Supreme Court Judge, Meir Shamgar, admitted in a letter to Professor Howard Grief (world expert on international law) that he made a mistake in telling the Israeli government that Israel could not annex liberated territories. Grief proved that Israel could legally annex the territories, as stated in the Petition to Annul Interim Agreement. Yet, many in Israel were and are not aware of this legal truth.
The Pentagon has conducted multiple studies on Israel's minimum territorial needs for survival. One that comes to mind was led by General Wheeler, a world class expert in military matters. He shared that Israel must have the territory of Judea and Samaria-the Jordan River Valley, Negev, Sinai, and the Golan Heights. To chop off these historic areas is to endanger the very survival of the only democracy in the Middle East.
Many of Israel's enemies seek to tear Israel apart in stages. These political attacks are ipso facto helping those who seek to commit genocide against Israel.
Expressions used by the Arabs are misleading and deceptive, camouflaging their true intentions of genocide over peace. As per the scholar Y. Hakabi, in Arab Attitudes to Israel, Routledge, January 1974, 0878551639ISBN-10. Professor Hakabi has reviewed more than 120 books written by Arabs. He has also analyzed Arab press and radio. Many scholars have noted that his raw material is still totally relevant today.
Arab propaganda can be classified into two groups:
(1) those that express explicit and undisguised statements calling upon Arabs to liquidate and achieve genocide against Israel;
(2) those that use ambiguous, oblique expressions that can be interpreted in different ways obfuscating their true intention of genocide.
Furthermore, a probing, judicial overview of today's terror organizations would conclusively prove their intention of carrying out genocide against the Jewish state. Without doubt, they would be convicted of the same 15 charges of genocidal war crimes as Nazi leader Adolf Eichman.
1. UNDISGUISED EXPRESSIONS.
"Liquidation" and achieve genocide against Israel or "ending" , the expression with the highest frequency; 'wiping out' (mahq, mahu), 'purification' or 'cleansing' (tasfiya); 'removal' (izala izaha); 'throwing into the sea'; 'death sentence'; 'throttling'; 'crushing' (sahq), 'destruction'; 'ruination' (tadmir); 'pulling up by the root' (isti sal); 'eradicaton'; 'overthrow' (isqat); 'sweeping out' (iktisah); 'bringing to an end' (inhat); 'elimination' (fana'); and the like. All these terms emphasize action to implement the liquidation.
Here are a few examples:
'Arab unity means the liquidation of (al-qada ala) and to 'achieve genocide against Israel and the expansionist dream of Zionism.' (Nasser at the Festival of Unity, February 22, 1965).
'The Arab people will pronounce the death sentence against 'criminal Israel,' namely disappearance.
'Israel is the cancer, the malignant wound, in the body of Arabism, for which there is no' cure but eradication.' 'There is no need to emphasize that the liquidation and achieving genocide against Israel and the restoration of the plundered Palestine Arab land are at the head of our national objectives.' (Commentator on Cairo Radio, April 20, 1963, at 20:55 hrs.)
'The victory over the power of colonialism in Algeria was a brilliant step for the' overthrow of another base for colonialism in the East-I refer to Israel.' (Egyptian' President Gamal Abdel Nasser, July 3, 1962)
Direct expressions may be divided into two sub-groups: the first is in the plan which covers the majority - the active, liquidating and genocidal factor that calls for military confrontation. The second is their propaganda, lies, distortions, exaggerations, and false blood libels. (As per Y. Hakabi)
It is clear that it is the Arabs who will initiate a genocidal operation, or at the least, participate in it.
If the 16 terror groups and states at war with Israel would be subject to a fair trial, the world would convict them on 15 counts of war crimes and genocide.
For instance: "Israel is a plague which must be liquidated" implies that the Arabs must act for the achievement of this goal.
In the second group, the liquidation is presented in somewhat more elegant terms as a process that will take place itself, without the initiating factor being specified.
Such formulae include expressions like: 'disappearance,' 'Israel will disappear' (takhafi), 'collapse' (inhiyar); 'clearing out'(zawal), 'downfall' (suqut); 'Israel will not escape her inevitable fate,' 'Israel will die' or 'the end of Israel' (nihayat Isra'il); 'non-survival' or 'non-existence' (la baqa).
According to al-Ahram, for instance, Ben Bella declared on May 1, 1965:
"There is no need for Israel to disappear, for it is an artificial creation and it is necessary to put an end to it" (wa yanbaghi al-qada alayha) (May 2, 1965). "No Arab Unity< Without the Disappearance of Israel" (name of pamphlet issued by Arab Higher Committee, Cairo, November, 1958). "The fate of this State is extinction, for it was born dead" (al-Mahlawi in Egyptian Political Science Review, January-March, 1959, 1. 118).
Even where the process is described as taking place of its own accord, the meaning may be more active, e.g: "The collapse of Israel, this is the hope in which we live. The time has come for us to consider it, to discuss and map out the road to this collapse." (Ahmad Sa'id, the Director of Cairo Radio (sawt al-'Arab), in his introduction to Sabri Abu al- Majd's book, "The End of Israel," 1960).
"The fate of this State is extinction, for it was born dead" (al-Mahlawi in Egyptian Political Science Review, January-March, 1959, 1. 118).
Even where the process is described as taking place of its own accord, the meaning may be more active, e.g: "The collapse of Israel, this is the hope in which we live. The time has come for us to consider it, to discuss and map out the road to collapse." (Ahmad Sa'id, the Director of Cairo Radio, (Sawt al-'Arab), in his introduction to Sabri Abu al-Majd's book, "The End of Israel," 1960).
These may be of a positive nature, consisting not of negative words like 'liquidation' or 'annihilation,' but terms which have a positive significance, like 'liberation,' but imply the aim to create a situation which is incompatible with Israel's survival, "for so long as Israel exists, Palestine in not liberated."
Other such expressions are "the liberation of the Homeland," "making Palestine Arab," "the return of Palestine to its owners," "the restoration of the stolen rights," "the restoration of the status quo" or "the restoration of the situation to normalcy."
In view of the special interest attached to these expressions, we shall analyze some of them in greater detail in the following section: "Terms Used to Express the Objective."
The meaning of these terms is perfectly clear to the Arabs. They emphasize a positive national goal without mentioning subsidiary results or situations which are a condition for its achievement, as if they were saying: "Our goal is the liberation of Palestine and nothing more, and if the liberation of Palestine makes it necessary that Israel should cease to exist, that is not our affair."
Continued at:
Avraham Feld: Islamic Danger-2.
|
