Research Extracts-39

Research Extracts-39 Research Sources from Brit-Am Now nos. 1823-1886 [Quoted from 1831-1883] (5 February 2016, 26 Shevet, 5776)

Contents:
1. The Name Yank from the Dutch Jan and Kees!
2. Hebrew Bagpipes in the Temple and the Harp of David.
3. Statistics: Brit-Am Nations and CleanTech Innovation.
4. The Australians NOT Lawrence and the Arabs Captured Damascus!
5. Philistines and Israelites in the West.
6. The Phoenicians from Tyre as Facilitators of the Israelite Movement to the West.
7. Ronald Reagan and Belief in the Ten Tribes
8. Question on China Being Sinim Instead of Australia and New Zealand
9. Slow-Down Planet? Is the Year Now longer? A New Research Breakthrough Thanks to Velikovsky???
Or A Wild Goose Chase? by Yair  Davidiy.
10. Cimmerians, Celts, and Hebrews.
11. Mark Williams: The Name Cohen.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1. The Name Yank from the Dutch Jan and Kees!
http://www.britam.org/now2/1831Now.html#1
VanDenBrandeDannyXXX has sent you a message:   

Hello sir

I dont know where u got the information about the meaning of yank from, but u are wrong on this point, beside that u are right on 99% of your other points this doesnt really matter but i want to explain u how the word yank or Yankees has developed.

So here i go,
we all know the Dutch founded new Amsterdam (New York) and that the Dutch had loads of men that where named Jan/Yan and Kees
which are still 2 common names that are used a lot in the Netherlands. The British came with this name for the Dutch
and named them Yankees the short version is Yanks and Yank for a single American these days "first they only named the large group of Dutch people in New York by this name later all of New York and now its a known term for Americans", it might be a coincidence that in Hebrew this means Jacob.

greetings

dendan from holland     

=============================
2. Hebrew Bagpipes in the Temple and the Harp of David.

http://www.britam.org/HebrewBagpipes.html
Extract:


The instrument David played upon in Hebrew is KINOR which really does mean a harp or something similar to it.

At present we are concerned with Bagpipes and the term "nabal".

The Nabal is recalled in the psalms amongst the instruments used by David.

Psalms 71:
22 Also with the lute I will praise You'
And Your faithfulness, O my God!
To You I will sing with the harp,
O Holy One of Israel.

The word translated as lute in Hebrew is  clei-nabal or literally instruments of the nabal i.e. of the animal stomach bag.
=============================
3. Statistics: Brit-Am Nations and CleanTech Innovation.
http://www.britam.org/now2/1838Now.html#3

http://britam.org/stats/Statsclean.html
Extract:
Denmark and Israel top the list.
16 out of the top 20 countries are Israelites.

The degree of CleanTech Innovative proficiency may be considered indicative of an innovative national characteristic, esteem for scientific inquiry i.e. knowledge of the truth, and concern for others through environmental consciousness.
These are all Israelite Characteristics.
It is therefore natural that Israelite Nations on a world wide scale of comparison should be dominant in this field.
============================
4. The Australians NOT Lawrence and the Arabs Captured Damascus!
http://www.britam.org/now2/1849Now.html#d
In your article on T.E. Lawrence and the Seven Pillars of Wisdom,
http://www.britam.org/Proverbs/Proverbs9.html#1

you mentioned that Lawrence took Damascus in 1918. This is incorrect, the Ottomans surrendered to the Australians (10th Light Horse Regiment from Western Australia). They were a part of a much larger British, Anzac and Indian Army grouping, so they didn't take Damascus by themselves, but the Ottomans surrendered to them, not to Lawrence's Arab Irregular Army.
Lawrence admitted that the 'Seven Pillars of Wisdom' was a combination of both history and fiction, and his account of the surrender at Damascus was fiction. He was confronted by General Sir Harry Chauvel, the Australian commander of the ANZAC mid-eastern forces during the Versailles Treaty meetings, and was commanded by his superior officers to apologised to him for his false claims.
============================
5. Philistines and Israelites in the West.
http://www.britam.org/now2/1856Now.html
http://www.britam.org/Peleshet.html
============================
6. The Phoenicians from Tyre as Facilitators of the Israelite Movement to the West.
3. The DAILY PROOF:
http://www.britam.org/now2/1857Now.html#3
Scripture prophesied that a portion of the Israelites would be exiled by Sea [Isaiah 9:1, 11:11], in large ships and fish-boats (Amos 4:2).
[See the Brit-Am Commentary (BAC) to these verses.
http://www.britam.org/ContentsSubject.html#lic ]
They were to be taken away by the Philistines (Amos 1:6,8) and by the Phoenicians of Tyre (Amos 1:9) who would deliver them to Edom in Europe.
The Philistines were culturally Minoans and a leading element amongst them had arrived from Crete the center of Minoan civilization.
Minoans, Myceaneans (from Greece), and Phoenicians were all intertwined with each other to some degree.
See: Philistines and Israelites in the West.
http://www.britam.org/Peleshet.html
Phoenician Colonies in co-ordination with the Assyrians were established in Spain, Scandinavia, and elsewhere in Northern Europe. Likewise strong indications exist of Phoenicians in Ireland, Britain, and Gaul. Irish and Greek traditions confirm these movements. Archaeological and other evidence (at least concerning Spain) proves that these settlements involved the re-settlement of Israelites. The settlements in Spain lasted until ca. 500 BCE after which they moved to the northwest and then to West France, and Ireland.
We wrote of this in some detail in our works
Lost Israelite Identity
http://britam.org/Menasseh.html
and  "Origin".
http://britam.org/origin.html
Subsequent research has confirmed and strengthened these findings.
Megalithic monuments and the culture behind them in Europe are traceable to these events.
This is Evidence. It is yet more proof that the Ten Tribes today are to be found amongst Western Peoples.
===========================
7. Ronald Reagan and Belief in the Ten Tribes
http://www.britam.org/now2/1866Now.html#3
http://www.britam.org/ReaganTT.html
Contents:
Introduction.
President Ronald Reagan.
Reagan and the Jews, Selected Extracts.
Did President Reagan Believe Like Brit-Am?
Interim Conclusion.
Extract:
President Reagan said he was descended from Irish Kings, that their capital had been named Tara, that Tara meant Torah, and that they were descended from Israelites!
===========================
8. Question on China Being Sinim Instead of Australia and New Zealand
http://www.britam.org/now2/1873Now.html#4
David Barlow wrote:

I always thought "Sinim" referred to China.  e.g. "Sino-Japanese Conflict." "Sino - Russian War."  etc.

Just wondering.

David Barlow,  N.Z.


Brit-Am Reply:
Shalom,
It is true that Sino means Chinese in English and is derived from Older sources.
e.g.
Sino- comb. form meaning "Chinese," 1879, from L.L. Sin'(pl.) "the Chinese," from Ptolemaic Gk. Sinai, from Arabic Sin "China," probably from Chinese Ch'in, name of the fourth dynasty of China (see China).
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php'term=Sino-

This could make China a candidate for the Land of Sinim in Isaiah 49:12.
Isaiah 49:
12 Surely these shall come from afar;
Look! Those from the north and the west,
And these from the land of Sinim.'

Australia and New Zealand however are also candidates as shown from the articles below.
Applying our Ephraimite Criteria we find Australia and New Zealand to fit the verse better than any other.
http://www.britam.org/criteria.html

See:

Aussie Blues
TG Challenges Brit-Am Over the Land of Sinim-Australia Equation!
http://www.britam.org/TGsinim.html

The Lost Ten Tribes in Australia:
Reply to Criticism
http://www.britam.org/critics/australia.html

Land of Sinim
The Lost Ten Tribes and Australia
http://www.britam.org/Proof/geo/geoAustralia.html

New Zealand in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codescountries/CodesNewZealand.html

Biblical Codes: Australia and the Land of Sinim
http://www.britam.org/Tribesman/CodesAustralia.html

Biblical Codes: Australia and the Matrix
Based on the Research of  Shmuel Treister.
http://www.britam.org/Tribesman/CodesTreister.html
===========================
9. Slow-Down Planet? Is the Year Now longer?
http://britam.org/now2/1874Now.html#2
http://www.britam.org/Year360.html
A New Research Breakthrough Thanks to Velikovsky???
Or A Wild Goose Chase? by Yair  Davidiy.
===========================
10. Cimmerians, Celts, and Hebrews.
http://www.britam.org/now2/1876Now.html#7
Other Possibilities Refuted.

Part 2 of
Is Longtom a Shortjohn?

The criticisms include the alleged unlikelihood of the Cimmerians having been Israelites. LT says the Celts were not similar to the Ancient Hebrews but they were comparable to the Aryans of India. This is not correct. We explain why.
===========================
11. Mark Williams: The Name Cohen.
http://britam.org/now2/1883Now.html#2
Shalom Yair

I was pondering the similarity of the Anglo-Gaelic surname "Cowen" to the Jewish surname "Cohen" and I came across this

"The second possibility is that Cohen is an Anglicized form of two Gaelic Irish surnames - O Cadhain of Connacht, and O Comhdhain of Ulster."

Read more:
http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/
Cohen#ixzz1wJu3aM8j

The article also mentions a John Cohen who lived in London in 1649 (during the reign of Charles 1, and thus before the readmittance of the Jews.

The same article also claims that not all Cohens are actually Kohens.

Confusing. Eh. 

Last name: Cohan
http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Cohan
This name has two distinct possible origins, the first being a Jewish name from the Hewbrew "Kohen", a priest. However not all Jews bearing this name belong to the priestly caste, descended from Aaron, the brother of Moses, as several members of the faith changed their name to Cohen to avoid forced military service in the Russian army, priests being the only males exempt from service. The second possibility is that Cohen is an Anglicized form of two Gaelic Irish surnames - O Cadhain of Connacht, and O Comhdhain of Ulster. The Gaelic prefix "O" indicates "male descendant of", plus the personal bynames "Cadhan" meaning "wild goose" and "Comhdan", a shared gift. Further Anglicezed forms of these names include Cowen, Coen, Coyne, Cohan, Cohn, Cohani, Cahani etc.. Registers of the Mambro Synagogue, London, record the birth of one, Levy Issoscher Cohen on November 24th 1772, and on August 20th 1864, the birth of Michael, son of John Cohen, was recorded in Claremorris, County Mayo. The first recorded spelling of the family name is shown to be that of John Cohen, (marriage to Anne Barlow), which was dated August 28th 1649, in St. Bartholomew the Less, London, during the reign of King Charles 1, known as "The Martyr" 1625 - 1649. Surnames became necessary when governments introduced personal taxation. In England this was known as Poll Tax. Throughout the centuries, surnames in every country have continued to "develop" often leading to astonishing variants of the original spelling.Â