Jerusalem News (26 August, 2013, Elul 20, 5773)
Contents:
1. Did Obama Order the Gas Attack? Information THEY do not want you to see!
Britam is NOT Brit-Am/Hebrew Nations but rather an Anglo-American Defence Company using a similar name!
2. Syrian Strife Stresses Shi'ite/Sunni Split
3. Skirting the ground: How the West will attack Syria
====
====
1. Did Obama Order the Gas Attack? Information THEY do not want you to see!Â
Britam is NOT Brit-Am/Hebrew Nations but rather an Anglo-American Defence Company using a similar name!
Background:
MailOnline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_Online
MailOnline (also known as dailymail.co.uk) is the website of the Daily Mail, a tabloid newspaper in the United Kingdom and a division of Associated Newspapers Ltd. The MailOnline website is one of the most visited newspaper websites in the world,[2] with over 100 million visitors per month in August 2012.
In January 29, 2013, Britain's most popular Daily Newspaper, in its online version Dailymail.co.uk published an article titled:
U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
The article says the correspondence of a British Defence Contractor Company named "Britam" (sic!)Â says that Washington had given the OK for Qatar to fund Syrian rebels to make a gas weapons attack and place the blame on Assad.
The source actually calls itself Britam. The name Britam is used not only by Brit-Am/Hebrew Nations but also by other groups including defence Contractors, tobacco companies, football teams, and Anglo-American associations.
Here is one of the relevant quotes:
# According to InfoWars.com the Dec 25 email was sent from Britam's Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
It reads:
"Phil we've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that it has approval by Washington.
We'll have to deliver a CW to Homs a Soviet origin shell from Libya similar to those Assad should have.
"They want us to deploy our Ukrainians personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
"Frankly I don't think it's a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
"Kind regards, David'. "
Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to MailOnline #
The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker.
A few days after its appearance MailOnline pulled the article.
Later in April 2013 MailOnline apologized and said they had been the victims of a hoax.
Now the article is difficult to access and is missing from cached sources that should have it.
See:
Deleted Daily Mail Online Article: 'US Backed Plan for Chemical Weapon Attack in Syria to Be Blamed on Assad'
http://friendsofsyria.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/deleted-daily-mail-online-article-us-backed-plan-for-chemical-weapon-attack-in-syria-to-be-blamed-on-assad/
Hebrew speakers may hear a quick report on (00.14):
http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleId=1000884&sid=126
Was the Syrian Gas Attack really the work of Assad?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/syria-cameron-obama-agree-military-2218347
Syrian state TV claimed that soldiers patrolling in the Damascus suburb of Jobar had found chemical weapon agents in rebel tunnels.
Russia said the nerve-gas outrage may be the work of rebels trying to provoke international action.
But Foreign Secretary William Hague dismissed the claims.
France joined the UK yesterday in blaming Assad for the attack.
Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said: 'All the information indicates there was a chemical massacre near Damascus and Bashar al-Assad is responsible'.
Brit-Am (i.e. our Lost Ten Tribes Hebrew Nations version) comment:
Assad has chemical weapons in stock and has used them in the past against Syrian rebels.
The Muslim Rebels are also probably quite capable of killing their own people if they think a more than commensurate benefit will result from it.
Would Obama countenance such an action?
I think he might but who knows?
====
====
2. Syrian Strife Stresses Shi'ite/Sunni Split
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/171304#.UhvG_iT8JRs
A rift has developed among Islamists, as Shi'ite and Sunni terror groups pick sides in Syria's bloody civil war.
By David Lev
First Publish: 8/26/2013, 4:43 PM
Extracts:
A rift has developed among various terrorist groups, who until recently had overlooked religious differences to cooperate in fighting Israel and other western interests, as they find themselves fighting on different sides of the Shi'ite/Sunni fault line which increasingly characterizes fight for or against the rule of Bashar Al-Assad.
On Friday, the IDF attacked a PFLP-GC base in south Lebanon. The attack came after terrorists from Lebanon fired several rockets at northern Israel. The Popular Front group in Lebanon is a leftist group, which in recent decades has aligned itself very closely with the Syrian regime, placing it in the same camp as the Shia Islamist group Hezbollah.
The Popular Front proclamation underscores a rift among terrorist factions regarding Assad. Hezbollah, the largest terror group in Syria, is allied with Assad, but many of the smaller rebel groups fighting against the Syrian president are affiliated with Al Qaeda. On Monday, reports said that the chief Islamist rebel group, Jabhat al-Nusra, which is very closely identified with Al Qaeda, executed the leader of Syria's Alawite community.
Sheikh Badar Razal, who headed the community, was kidnapped several weeks ago by rebel groups, as Al-Nusra conquered dozens of Alawite villages. Dozens of men have been killed, reports said, while the women and children are being held for ransom. Al-Nusra published a photo of Razal's body.
Alawite Islam is a faction of Shi'ite Islam; Assad is an Alawite, while his main Islamist allies, Hizbullah and Iran, are Shi'ite. Both Shi'ites and Alawites are regarded as heretics by Sunni Muslims, which Al-Qaeda is affiliated with.
====
====
3. Skirting the ground: How the West will attack Syria
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4422534,00.html
Ynet
Published: 08.26.13, 19:51 / Israel News
Extracts:
According to the Daily Mail, military analysts believe an attack could last between 24 and 48 hours and would target key regime installations.
These would include Syria's integrated air defense system, command and control bunkers, communications hubs, government buildings, missile sites and Assad's air force.
The dictator's use of air power has been a huge advantage for the regime, and eliminating or weakening it would tilt the odds toward the rebels, said the report.
Other military options are airstrikes on Syrian units believed to be responsible for chemical attacks. US-led strikes would be launched from warships or submarines patrolling in the eastern Mediterranean or Persian Gulf, or from combat aircraft that can fire missiles from hundreds of miles away.
A US Navy battle group including four destroyers is already in the eastern Mediterranean and has moved closer to Syria in preparation for action.
The US Air Force could also send B-2 stealth bombers to pound Assad's military installations. Based in Missouri, they can cover the entire world with just one refueling.
According to the Daily Mail, as well as having F-16 fighter jets and refueling aircraft based at airfields in the Middle East, the US also has defensive Patriot missile batteries positioned in Jordan...
Despite multi-billion-dollar cuts to the defense budge that have seen top brass axe fast jets, warships, spy planes and 30,000 troops, the British armed forces can still contribute to an assault on Syria.
The Royal Navy could fire Tomahawk missiles from its nuclear-powered Trafalgar-class submarines - one of which is constantly on patrol in the Middle East.
Related stories:
Turkey would join coalition against Syria, says FM
Syrian official: Israel 'will come under fire' if Syria attacked
Top member of Assad's party warns 'We have strategic weapons aimed at Israel.' Russia objects to intervention, cautions against repeat of 'past mistakes'
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4422473,00.html
Roi Kais
See:
Brit-Am Now no. 2120
#2. Getting Closer to the End Times? Will Ephraim (the USA and UK) invade Syria/Gilead-Bashan?
http://hebrewnations.com/features/now4/2120.html#a2
Â