Ten Tribes Studies. Yair Davidiy
Contents:
 1. The most successful Brit-Am YouTube Clip of them all (90,967 views as of September 26, 2012).
 2. 2nd Message from Jim.
 3. John "Globetrotter": Possible Future Changes of the Earth's Surface. 
 4. David Barlow: The Ark was not taken to Babylon!
 5. 2 New Articles. 
 (a) Your State in Scripture. Biblical Place Names in the USA
 (b) Alabama and Elijah.
 6. New YouTube Clip: Alabama and Israel.
 7. The Snake and the Messiah.
1. The most successful Brit-Am YouTube Clip of them all (90,967 views as of September 26, 2012).
This is part one. Part two received 9,153.
 WHERE ARE THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL Part 1
Clip shows Yair Davidiy interviewed by Gavin Finley and lasts for 9 minutes.
Duration ca. 9 Minutes. For continuation of article items please scroll down.
 
Filmed ca. October 2007 but presented for viewing in its present form a good while later.
 Clip seems to consist of excerpts from ca. 13 other clips
See Gavin Finley Interviews Yair Davidiy of Brit-Am.
 These clips as individual units also received a great number of visits some of them totalling close to 10,000 views.
Re Brit-Am Now no. 1938: Ten Tribes Studies.
 #3. Donation Sent. 
 Yair,
 I really wish I could send you a whole lot more.
 Your videos have been very meaningful to me.
 Anything holy is under attack and has been for centuries.
 Your efforts have been massive in turning back hearts of the holy people.
 I just hope more of them can hear your message.
 -Jim
3. John "Globetrotter": Possible Future Changes of the Earth's Surface. 
 RE: Brit-Am Now no. 1938: Ten Tribes Studies
 # 4. Ross: Brit-am has added greatly to my understanding of the subject.
 Shalom Yair
 I found the comments by Ross extremely interesting. 
 ... there is strong indication that the earth will undergo major geological and geographical changes once again at the
 coming of Messiah. The time is likened to the days of Noah (c. Gen 6-8) and
 the more we 'peel that onion', the more it would appear to be true. There
 is growing evidence that the earth is much younger than 'evolutionary
 science' claims, and that the large single continent of Pangaea comprised
 the main pre-Flood topography of the earth. God designed it that way for a
 reason.
 Then came the Flood which radically altered the earth's surface, creating
 for example the Mediterranean ('middle of the earth') Sea, the Atlantic
 ocean, the Americas and Australasia. It was now time for God to isolate
 distant lands and continents that could only be accessed after long treks or
 voyages and in preparation for future Israelite migration/colonisation. In
 this way, and well in advance, "the Most High divided their inheritance to
 the nations, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the boundaries of
 the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel" (Deut 32:8)
 -- complete with 'choke-points' or 'gates'. 'Continental drift' was in fact
 more of a 'sprint'.
 Had the world remained one large continent or even several smaller, but
 close ones, the English-speaking colonisation of USA, Canada, Australia and
 'to the ends of the earth' (Deut 33:17) would never have taken place. Such
 areas would not have been 'virgin' lands of significant space and natural
 resources, and given the time to develop into world powers. They would have
 become ravished and denuded like North Africa or the Middle East. After the
 pattern of Nimrod (Gen 10-11), powerful European or Asiatic or equivalent
 empires would have controlled these continents, making periods of relative
 peace impossible. There would have been no Gulf Stream to ensure temperate
 climate and fertility around the Atlantic seaboard. There would have been
 no Royal Navy to police the 18th and 19th an early 20th centuries, nor any
 US 'arsenal' to successfully combat Germany, Japan and the Soviet Union --
 or indeed defend Israel -- during and since WW2.
 The question would then arise as to whether in the Messianic age, the need
 for the 'Americas' (for example) remains; or whether another global
 topography underpinning a more centralised society (rather like in Noah's
 day) and world capital in Jerusalem performs a better function for God and
 mankind. Who knows what might happen to these large continents after the
 Pacific 'ring of fire', tsunamis, global war, other natural phenomena and
 supernatural intervention have taken their toll? 
 Moreover, since there is to be highway from Egypt to Assyria via Israel (Isa
 19:23), and if 'modern Assyria' is in fact in Europe rather than Kurdistan,
 such a route would require massive geographical changes to the eastern
 Mediterranean, Turkey and the Balkans. This, together with the removal of
 the Nile Delta (Isa 11:15), further suggests a reclaimed sub-continent
 extending from Egypt up through Cyprus to Turkey, and the Bosporus / Greek
 islands becoming a plain. (Brit-Am publications have suggested that
 'Greater Israel' would include Cyprus and part of Anatolia.) 
 It will be a time of easy access to Jerusalem for all nations (Zech
 14:16-19) -- thus removing any excuse for not attending there to worship the
 King. This might indicate a more 'Pangaea-like' world without the need for
 fleets of jumbo jets. ...The 'mountain of the Lord's house' in Isa 2:2-3 (coupled with Dan 2:35; Joel
 3:17 etc.) may be as much a topographical description of Millennial
 Jerusalem as a symbol of Messiah's government -- visible from a great
 distance, and perhaps the result of the massive earthquake yet to occur
 there (Ezek 38:19; Rev 11:13). 
 Indeed Zech 14:8 (coupled with Joel 2:20) may hint at a rather more equal
 distribution of the 'living waters' than simply flowing into a massive
 western sea (the Med) and a tiny eastern (Dead) sea that we have today.
 What better way to desalinate the Dead Sea (in addition to supernatural,
 ecological re-engineering) than flush and dilute it with much more water --
 perhaps from the re-routed Aqaba or Persian Gulf? 
 "So they will say, 'This land that was desolate has become like the garden
 of Eden..." (Ezek 36:35) -- by which point will the earth and mankind have
 come full circle?
 Regards
 John
4. David Barlow: The Ark was not taken to Babylon!
 Dear Yair,
 Shalom!
 Re your recent posting:
 Brit-Am Now no. 1937: Ten Tribes Studies.
 #3. Biblical and Judaic Curiosities (a) Where is the Ark of the Covenant? The Sacred Ark of the Covenant with the original tablets of the Ten Commandments, as well as the jar of manna, the rod of Aharon, and other treasures were probably buried in a cave or tunnel under the Temple Mount. One opinion however say that the Ark of the Covenant was taken to Babylon by Nebuchadnessar (Talmud Arakin 13 Tosefot).
 ====
 I have always doubted very much that the Ark was taken to Babylon. We read in Jeremiah 52:18-19 
 "They also took away the pots, the shovels, the trimmers, the bowls, the spoons, and all the bronze utensils with which the priests ministered. The basins, the firepans, the bowls, the pots, the lampstands, the spoons, and the cups, whatever was solid gold and whatever was solid silver, the captain of the guard took away." (New King James Bible).
 Here is a part of the list of that which was carried away which includes things even as small as 'spoons and trimmers!' Surely if a thing of such great significance as the Ark had been carried off, it would have been recorded here.
 Very best regards,
 David Barlow, N.Z.
5. 2 New Articles. 
 (a) Your State in Scripture. Biblical Place Names in the USA
 (b) Alabama and Elijah
6. New YouTube Clip: Alabama and Israel
 Duration ca. 27 minutes
 The State of Alabama (like other States in the USA ) contains numerous place-names associated with the Bible.
 We list these names and search for Tribal Indications or common themes through them.
 See:
 Alabama and Elijah
To see rest of article entries please scroll down.
7. The Snake and the Messiah.
 Re Dan and the Messiah
You said:
 Dan has aspects of the serpent BUT the Serpent of Dan serves the side of Holiness to overcome the Serpent of Evil. Dan serves as a balance against the forces of adversity. 
 Can you say more about this?
Brit-Am Reply:
 We were quoting from the Commentator RAMADO upon whom the article was based.
 It is worth noting however the name Nahshon in the genealogy of David, e.g.
 Ruth 4:
 18 Now this is the genealogy of Perez: Perez begot Hezron; 19 Hezron begot Ram, and Ram begot Amminadab; 20 Amminadab begot Nahshon, and Nahshon begot Salmon; 21 Salmon begot Boaz, and Boaz begot Obed; 22 Obed begot Jesse, and Jesse begot David.
 Boaz the great-grandfather of David. The grandfather of Boaz was Nahshon. The name Nahshon (in Hebrew Nachshon) is derived from the root Na-CH-aSH meaning serpent or snake. The snake was not necessarily always a negative element. The Messiah will be descended from David and through David from an ancestor named after a snake.
