Tribal Report: British Isles, South Africa, Scandinavia, OBAMArica (19 February, 2013. 9 Adar, 5773)
Contents:
1. British Isles: Irish, Welsh, British Physical Type Mainly Dark-Haired and Light Eyed?
2. South African Whites in Trouble
3. Scandinavian Countries the Major Perpetrators of Treason Against Israel
====
====
1. British Isles: Irish, Welsh, British Physical Type Mainly Dark-Haired and Light Eyed?
As regards Ireland, the sum of the diverse analyses seems to be
that. . . in both Ireland and Wales the proportionately strongest
morphological type is what we call Nordic Mediterranean - long-heads
with dark hair and mixed eyes. This seems to be the fundamental
type of the British Isles. It probably incorporates in both countries
the bulk of the descendants of Paleolithic settlers (present in Britain
only)? of the Mesolithic inhabitants, of the Neolithic and Megalithic
peoples, with some reinforcement from later comers. The morphological
type second in strength in both countries is what we have called
the Keltic type, long-headed with pure light eyes (p. 235). And,
'We can be certain that the Norman conquest introduced no subracial
or morphological types that were not already represented in
the population, and the same can be said of further colonization by
the English and whoever else arrived subsequently in sufficient force
of numbers to count in the present day population of Ireland'
(p. 223). It should also perhaps be noted at this point that Doctor
Hooton takes sharp issue with Professor Carleton S. Coon's interpretation
of the present Irish data in the latter's book 'The Races
of Man' (Coon, '39). 'The principal point at issue is Coon's hypothesis
of the 'survival' or 'reemergence of Upper Palaeolithic'
types. . . .' in Ireland, a position which Professor Hooton finds untenable
(p. 239)'.
"Apparently more persons with dark eyes, dark skins, curved varieties
of hair, and pi-amented moles, were found in the young than
among the old in the present male series. Doctor Hooton explains this
peculiar situation by postulating a theory of 'selective survival of
light-eyed persons and of progressive elimination of dark-eyed persons
throughout the older age groups,' Â although, 'Of course, this explanation
raises the presumpt.ion that most of the dark-eyed Irish either
die early in life or marry light-eyed mates and leave only mixed-eye
progeny' (p. 201). Professor Hooton refers one to a previous publication
for a more extensive treatment of the subject of age and  'selective
survival' in the Irish (Hooton and Dupertuis, '51)."
From a summary of THE PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF IRELAND. By Earnest Hooton and C. Wesley Dupertuis found in the "American Journal of Physical Anthropology"
Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Pages 328 - 333
====
====
2. South African Whites in Trouble
A former South African on the new South Africa - Into the Cannibal's PotÂ
Contributed to HellasFrappe
By Dennis Yannoutsos
Extracts:
South African-born Ilana Mercer is the daughter of a rabbi who was active in the fight against apartheid. ...
Mrs. Mercer is no apologist for the apartheid system, which she calls 'reprehensible' and 'contemptible,' but she clears up some misconceptions about it. Apartheid was never based on a theory of racial supremacy; rather, it was a survival strategy for the badly outnumbered Boers. She notes that the Afrikaner nationalist intelligentsia 'almost without exception defended apartheid not as an expression of white superiority but on the grounds of its assumed capacity to reduce conflict by curtailing points of interracial contact.' The system was anything but lawless; the Afrikaner government 'was characterized by an obsession with imposing restrictions through proper legislation and with due process in executing these laws.'
On the eve of Afrikaner rule in 1946, the black population of South Africa was 8.6 million; by 1991 it had grown to 28.3 million. At the same time, life expectancy soared from 38 to 61 years.
This period saw the economy grow by an average 3.5 percent every year. White industrialists, especially in the mining industry, put constant pressure on the government to allow them to use more black labor, and it was during these years that blacks came to dominate many semi-skilled trades such as construction, sheet metal, furniture, clothing, and baking.
Under apartheid, the white share of total personal income steadily declined as the black share rose. According to the International Monetary Fund, by 1987 South African whites were paying 32 percent of their incomes in taxes but receiving only 9 percent in benefits. The excess was consumed mostly by blacks in the form of welfare, housing, health, and education, amounting to one-and-a-half times what they paid in. South Africa was a Mecca for black immigrants from across the continent. Indeed, were it not for the international boycotts and embargoes, South Africa would probably have continued to experience steady economic growth, producing a sizeable black middle class with an interest in political stability.
Crime was already a problem in the black townships in those days, but a tough and competent white police force kept it within bounds. A Western system of Roman-Dutch law and a relatively independent judiciary dished out prompt and harsh justice, including the death penalty for necklacing, muti-murder (aimed at obtaining body parts for witchcraft) and baby-rape (believed to cure AIDS). However much they resented the race laws, ordinary blacks had no desire to do without the physical protection offered by the white police force.
Much of the apartheid system was gradually scrapped by the white government itself, beginning in the early 1980s. Coloreds and Indians were admitted to Parliament, influx control laws were dismantled, public facilities desegregated, and anti-miscegenation laws repealed. Blacks enjoyed full property rights and were accepted at historically white universities.
More people are murdered in a typical week under ANC rule than died in detention during 40 years of Afrikaner rule.
As the old system approached its end, the major obstacle to negotiating a new constitutional order was the question of whether South Africa would become a unified, centralized democracy, as demanded by the ANC, or a cooperative federation of the various racial and tribal groups. One cannot understand South African politics without grasping this issue.
In surveys conducted between 1986 and 1989, two-thirds of South Africa's whites preferred some sort of power-sharing accommodation with blacks rather than majority rule.
Many blacks felt the same way. One survey taken in Soweto in 1978 found that 57 percent of blacks preferred equal numbers of blacks and whites in the cabinet. Only 35 percent favored pure majority rule. 'Perhaps most blacks realized that being disenfranchised in a functioning state was preferable to being masters in a failed one,' suggests Mrs. Mercer.
This was not to be. The ANC insisted on unlimited power for the 'majority,' meaning itself. Its demands were fully supported by the United States.
In the 1994 elections, the ANC received over 62 percent of the vote. Large-scale intimidation had made it nearly impossible for rival parties to campaign in the African townships.
Mrs. Mercer explains that the main ANC policy is a program called Black Economic Empowerment, or BEE. This requires that a percentage of all white-owned companies be taken over by blacks, on pain of being shut down. By 2014, the employees of all enterprises are supposed to be 'demographically representative,' i.e., at least 75 percent black and not more than 10 percent white. This transfer is known, ironically, as 'deracializing the economy.'
The average black household saw its income shrink by 19 percent during the first six years of ANC rule, and the total number of persons of all races living in 'absolute poverty' has doubled since the ANC came to power.
Whites have also suffered. One tenth now live in poverty, many in huts without sanitation or electricity. Around a million whites are thought to have left South Africa; the exact number is uncertain, because the government stopped keeping records. Nelson Mandela describes fleeing whites as 'traitors'  and  'cowards.'
South Africa jostles with Iraq and Colombia for the title of most violent country in the world. Over 300,000 people of all races have been murdered since the establishment of majority rule.
More people are killed in a typical week under ANC rule than died in detention during 40 years of Afrikaner rule.
In the European Union, the murder rate is about 1.6 per 100,000 people per year; in American it is 6 (whites: 3.5; blacks: 26.5). The South African rate depends upon whom you ask. The police claim it is 60, but outside observers note what Mrs. Mercer calls a 'pervasive pattern of police manipulation of statistics.' The South Africa Medical Research Council says the true number is closer to 89; Interpol estimates it at 114.8. Among South Africa's white farmers, the figure is thought to reach 313. That is nearly 200 times the murder rate of Europe.
Fifteen million acres of productive farmland have already been transferred to black ownership, and much of this now lies fallow. A London Times journalist writes:
Once-productive maize fields now grow only weeds. Citrus orchards are dying, their valuable fruit rotting on the branches. Machinery lies about rusting. Irrigation pipes have been looted and farm sheds are derelict and stripped of roofing. Windbreak trees have been hacked down and roads are potholed.
Islam today is the largest religion of conversion, with over a million followers, or 2 percent of the population.
====
====
3. Scandinavian Countries the Major Perpetrators of Treason Against Israel
====
(a) NGO Monitor: Report February 2013
Extracts:
NGO Monitor is s Jerusalem based research institution, providing information and analysis, promoting transparency, and supporting discussion on the reports and activities of NGOs (non-governmental organizations) claiming to advance human rights and humanitarian agendas.
Many other political advocacy NGOs that regularly receive funding from foreign governments did not submit quarterly reports for 2012. It is unknown whether they did not receive foreign government funding during the reporting period, whether they have failed to act in accordance with the law, or whether they did not report due technical issues in the reporting system.
 The added transparency in 2012 reveals major funding by Norway (4,598,507 NIS) and via the NGO Development Center-NDC [Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland] (4,234,770 NIS),1 which comprise 21.2% and 19.5% of reported grants respectively.
Some of the donors (conduits for indirect government support), such as Christian Aid, Diakonia and the Norwegian Refugee Council, are also involved in highly biased delegitimization campaigns against Israel.
See Table:
What do these Nations really want?
Do they wish for the destruction of Israel?
Why?
====
(b) Caroline Glick: US government funding radical Israeli NGOs' information operations
Extracts:
It is worth noting that through US Embassy cables published by Wikileaks we learned from B'Tselem's Executive Director Jessica Montell that B'Tselem is almost entirely dependent on foreign governmental assistance. She said that 95 percent of B'tselem's budget is paid for by foreign governments. Montell told her interlocutor at the Embassy that B'Tselem wished to engender an international climate of hostility towards Israel that would make Israeli leaders fear the international response to IDF operations against Palestinian terror campaign so much that they would fear taking action. The cable was written after Operation Cast Lead. B'Tselem was one of the Israeli NGOs that told the Goldstone Commission Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza.Â
According to the leaked cable:
She [Montell] wanted the highest level decision-makers held accountable for the decisions they made on how to prosecute the conflict, including, Military Advocate Gneral (MAG) [BG Avi] Mandelblit...Her aim she said, was to make Israel weigh world opinion and consider whether it could "afford another operation like this."
The Israeli media itself is already controlled in large part by the far Left. Channel 2 news and the station's flagship satire program "Eretz Nehederet" played a huge role in shaping public perceptions in the last elections. Both worked overtime trying to demonize Naftali Bennett and the Jewish Home Party. This they did after they worked overtime demonizing the winners of Likud's party primaries as right wing extremists. Muli Segev, Eretz Nehederet's editor in chief bragged in an interview in Haaretz that his show was directly responsible for the party's loss of several Knesset seats.
But apparently, the State Department thinks this anti-Israel activism posing as the local media is insufficiently pro-Arab. And so it is funding these even more radical Israeli pressure groups.